State looks for fire lessons

By: DAVE DOWNEY - Staff Writer
Lack of aircraft, Reverse 911 system's performance criticized | Wednesday, December 12, 2007 11:08 PM PST

SAN DIEGO -- While some things were done right in battling October's Santa Ana wind-driven wildfires, panelists told a state legislative panel in a fact-finding hearing Wednesday that many things could have been done better.

Aircraft could have joined the firefight sooner, telephone calls urging people to evacuate could have reached a wider audience, aging thick brush in the backcountry could have been thinned ahead of time, and a bigger army of firefighters might have saved defenseless homes in nearly deserted Rancho Bernardo, public officials and fire victims said.

As well, the state's No. 2 fire official said that 30,000 conifer seedlings would be made available for efforts to replant the ravaged forest around the rim of Palomar Mountain.

Sen. Christine Kehoe, D-San Diego and vice chairwoman of the Joint Legislative Committee on Emergency Services, said that the hearing was a first step toward addressing problems in Sacramento next year.

"I think there will be a lot of legislation on the fires," Kehoe said, after the five-hour hearing in a University of San Diego auditorium.

In a sharp exchange near the start of the hearing, an Orange County lawmaker blasted California's primary firefighting agency, saying a California National Guard report proves that a state policy, as opposed to the weather, grounded four guard helicopters during the crucial early hours of the firefight.

"We were told it was the wind," said Assemblyman Todd Spitzer, R-Orange, in stressing that the report stated the helicopters were ready to fly Monday morning during the weeklong firestorms that swept across Southern California. "We now know it wasn't the wind."

California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection officials have said that policy required state fire spotters to escort military aircraft pilots through fire zones, instructing them precisely where to drop water and fire retardant, and that spotters did not become available until a few hours later.

Once available, said Ruben Grijalva, director of the agency known as CalFire, fierce Santa Ana winds and blinding smoky conditions prevented the aircraft from engaging the runaway flames.

"Pilots were going up and they were coming back down," Grijalva said.

Maj. Gen. William Wade, adjutant general of the state National Guard, said the helicopters were asked to confront the region's largest blaze, the Witch Creek fire of North County that would scorch nearly 200,000 acres. Wade said that all four joined the fight the next day, or on Tuesday of that disastrous week of firestorms.

Spitzer said that it was a waste for the helicopters to sit idly by on Monday because the wind over Orange County was tolerable for flying and the aircraft might have helped firefighters corral the Santiago fire that raged near Irvine.

The hearing also addressed criticism that the California National Guard had promised four years ago to outfit a pair of C-130 cargo planes with tanks but never delivered, and so the aircraft weren't available earlier this fall. Wade said the two will be equipped by June.

State Sen. Dennis Hollingsworth, R-Murrieta, said California should consider whether to outfit the guard's other six C-130s for firefighting purposes, something that would cost about $24 million. Corona fire Chief Mike Warren, chairman of the governor's blue-ribbon task force on wildfires formed after the 2003 blazes, said the task force planned to address that and other key questions at a meeting in San Diego next week.

Near the end of the hearing, fire victim Wayne Coulon, an insurance agent who lost his Rancho Bernardo home, said what was needed more than helicopters were firefighters and fire engines -- none of which were seen for hours after the Witch Creek blaze hit the community.

"We can talk about aircraft, spotters and all that stuff all we want, but they are not going to make that much difference," Coulon said.

Rudy Reyes, 26, who suffered burns over two-thirds of his body after helping his family evacuate their Wildcat Canyon home during the 2003 Cedar fire, said one thing that would have made a difference would have been aggressive thinning and burning of overgrown brush in the backcountry. But Reyes said the county several years ago closed its honor camps, at which inmates carved fire breaks in the brush.

While the county received praise for its Reverse 911 program that warned hundreds of thousands of residents to flee approaching flames, the message didn't reach most in the devastated La Jolla Indian Reservation, said Joseph Ruise, a captain with the 10-member La Jolla Volunteer Fire Department. Ruise said that, of 120 reservation families he polled, just five were contacted through the county's telephone warning system.

Ron Lane, county emergency services director, said the problems that prevented more from being alerted to evacuate are being fixed.

As for the 30,000 pine and fir seedlings to be offered for replanting Palomar Mountain above the reservation early next year, those will be available through the San Diego unit of CalFire, said Crawford Tuttle, the agency's chief deputy director. For more information about the program, call (619) 590-3100.

-- Contact staff writer Dave Downey at (760) 745-6611, Ext. 2623, or ddowney@nctimes.com.

Next Previous
Bookmark and Share

Advertisement

Pre-Registration Comments[-]Go to Top

1st lesson wrote on Dec 13, 2007 9:04 AM:Reduce urban sprawl. If you build in fire prone areas then you must have a fire resistant structure and fire hazards cleared from several hundred feet from the structure. Duh. Otherwise let the fires burn. It is nature's way of reducing the fire load and many species depend on regular burns in our habitat.

Escondeeter wrote on Dec 13, 2007 10:38 AM:Same first less in an even simpler version: "Don't build houses near stuff that burns".

chubbs wrote on Dec 13, 2007 12:47 PM:Where vacant land adjoins properties with homes on them the vacant land should be required to maintain a two hundred foot clear buffer from any building wall.

Sigh wrote on Dec 13, 2007 1:06 PM:Urban sprawl? Stuff that burns? Someone has to live on the edge of a city, no matter how big or small there is always a perimeter, ding dongs. Next big earthquake I'm going to post how idiots shouldn't be so condensed in big high rise buildings.

Bernard wrote on Dec 13, 2007 1:12 PM:Look to Australia and Ventura County (VC has its own fire dept; not CalFire) for fire protection leadership. They practice Go Early or Stay and Defend which is for all types of homes, both OLD and new. Look to SD County Fire Safe Councils working in areas with old and new homes. Shelter-In-Place (SIP) is only for new homes built in specific shelter-in-place communities. Every stakeholder (homeowner) old house, new house, SIP house, needs to be involved, educated, and trained. Every stakeholder that needs help physically, or is afraid, or other situations should be on lists for early evacuation. We need well trained FF volunteers. The current FF's are overloaded and we don't have the monies for a firetruck for every house. The aircraft is as important as are FF's with up-to-date fire equipment. The 2007 mass phone calls for evacuation (reverse 911 systen) almost cost more lives as people sat in vehicles for hours unable to escape. Some phone call warnings were several hours late. Phones need to be set up to evacuate smaller precise fire areas. Current and past CalFire top management is on a political power trip and does not provide the leadership that we need. Improvements need to be made by CalFire by listening to the Fire Chiefs, the FF's, the ideas of ordinary people, university professors that study fire and evacuation with up-to-date expensive equipment, CalFire needs to generate fire studies with up-to-date programs instead of the old 'behave' program, and work with the informed men and women at the Federal USFS Missoula Fire Sciences Lab. CalFire is too big and too political and therefore missed many opportunities to make improvements from 2003 to 2007. History will probably repeat itself because politicians tend to do more harm than good. They ignore: science, common sense, necessary improvements, the needs of the people (stakeholders). The cost of 2007 fires - lives and homes - is huge. This will continue to happen until the stakeholders are part of the solution. That's how the west was won, people being involved. A year round fire season needs help from every able body. Yes to: training the stakeholders (homeowners), defensible space, fire resistant building materials, fire resistant plants, removing brush with help from prisoners. Teach the stakeholders and then they make their choice to Go Early or Stay and Defend.

Registered Comments[-]Go to Top

Advertisement

Videos