Carnac would know not to cry racism

By: JIM TRAGESER ---- Staff Writer | Thursday, August 9, 2007 9:57 AM PDT

Bill Flores missed his calling.

The local Latino activist told a North County Times reporter last week that a newly formed group in Escondido that supports the Police Department's traffic checkpoints are in reality not at all about public safety.

Nope, it seems Flores has read their minds and determined that they're really closet racists.

"No matter what alias this (road safety) group has, we know who they are. They're anti-immigration, they're anti-Latino, and we know exactly how they feel, no matter what they call themselves." (From Saturday's Times ---- "Grass-roots group says many support Escondido driver's license checkpoints".)

This quote from the retired San Diego County assistant sheriff came in response to the formation of Citizens of Escondido for Road Safety, a group that has collected some 700 signatures in support of the traffic checkpoints.

Your loyal columnist (that would be me) has vociferously opposed Escondido's proposed and rescinded rental ban, which openly targeted illegal immigration, and the pending law to ban overnight parking on city streets, which seems to target not only illegal immigrants, but Latinos in general (as well as non-Latino poor).

But traffic checkpoints target everyone ---- well, everyone who is unlicensed, lacks auto insurance and/or drives an unregistered or unsafe vehicle.

Flores, in his role as spokesman for El Grupo ---- a coalition of various activist groups concerned with Latino rights ---- makes the argument that the traffic checkpoints are racist because they unfairly impact illegal immigrants, who are unable to get a driver's license.

By that argument, traffic checkpoints discriminate against underage drivers too, because people under 16 can't get a driver's license or insurance. We should stop discriminating against them and let them drive, eh, Bill?

Flores' argument that checkpoints discriminate is weak. No, it's more than that: It's laughable.

There are serious human rights issues surrounding illegal immigration in this community, many of which have been addressed in this very column.

But driving is and always has been a privilege in this nation, not a right. And if you're too poor to afford auto insurance, then, I'm sorry, you shouldn't be driving, and I say that as someone who has spent huge swaths of his adulthood riding buses for that very reason. It's called personal responsibility, a concept unbounded by ethnicity, culture or geography.

Further, not everyone who is in support of keeping unlicensed and uninsured drivers off our roads is a racist ---- despite Flores' claim of telepathic powers.

Are there racists involved in the anti-illegal immigration movement?

Sure, but that's a far cry from calling everyone who opposes illegal immigration a racist.

Frankly, Flores' claim of telepathy is almost as absurd as his arguments about the checkpoints.

I mean, really, if Flores could read people's minds, as if he were a real-life version of Johnny Carson's Carnac the Magnificent, wouldn't he be spending his time entering professional poker tournaments or coaching "American Idol" entrants on what Simon Cowell really wants?

Either would be a better use of his time than hurling charges of racism at anyone who doesn't agree with him on every point of every issue.

Contact columnist Jim Trageser at (760) 631-6628 or jtrageser@nctimes.com.

Advertisement

5 comment(s)[-]Go to Top

Pluto wrote on Aug 9, 2007 1:08 PM:Mr. Trageser either doesn’t read his own newspaper or he deliberately omitted an important piece of information. Among other anti-immigrant measures by Escondido, police refuse to recognize valid drivers licenses from certain other countries and states, impounding the cars of those drivers for a minimum of 30 days (huge cost to retrieve car). Escondido is being sued for this practice which violates state law. This practice means that the Escondido checkpoints target immigrants, just like the old poll taxes and literacy tests for voting in the South targeted Blacks. They look fair on their face, but the effect is to target a certain segment of the population with foreign or out-of-state licenses who can’t afford to get their car back after 30 days in impound. These facts were undoubtedly not lost on Mr. Flores, who apparently reads the newspaper and is capable of adding two and two and getting four.

JWh wrote on Aug 9, 2007 2:10 PM:Well Jim I agree with most everything so said but you left out one terribly important item. Police "roadblocks" are illegal for a variety of reasons the most easilly recognizable being that police must have "just cause" to stop a vehicle. That "just cause" could be a broken tailight, a blatant traffic violation, poor or dangerous driving skills but NOT just because they want to check your "documents". I've never seen one of these checkpoints but I have seen the alcohol ones and I just drive around them. They've never pursued me because they know they have no right. To people who blindly trust their government this must seem a minor issue. To those of us who know better this is a major violation of police power. I'd like to get rid of the unlicensed drivers too but everytime we give up a right we don't get it back and no one should be giving up my rights for me. Besides most licensed drivers are also incompetent and often uninsured.

RG wrote on Aug 9, 2007 2:14 PM:This guy Flores claims to be former law enforcement? This is not the first time he has been opposed to correcting societal problems of those breaking our laws. Seems all he does is make excuses for them while wailing racism. Flores is a joke. How can any thinking person take what he says seriously? His credibility is zero.

Sorry Pluto wrote on Aug 9, 2007 2:51 PM:If you're in CA for over 10 days, you are required to have a CA license! I am not a racist. In fact I am quite liberal. But these traffic checks are terrific. Unlicensed drivers, unregistered vehicles, vehicles with no insurance- get them ALL off the road so I don't have to keep paying my high premiums for their lack of responsiblity.

JoeMorgan wrote on Aug 10, 2007 9:11 AM:From article: "Are there racists involved in the anti-illegal immigration movement?" Given that the term racist is simply a synonym used to define European-Americans who discriminate, then sure there are European-Americans involved in the anti illegal immigration movement. All nonwhites discriminate in terms of race, but since they are not Europeans in ancestry they are never called "racist" for doing so.

First name only. Comments including last names, contact addresses, e-mail addresses or phone numbers will be deleted. Attempts to misrepresent your identity or impersonate any person will not be approved. All comments are screened before they appear online, so please keep them brief. Comments reflect the views of those commenting and not necessarily those of the North County Times or its staff writers. Click here to view additional comment policies.

Submit Comment[-]

(optional)
   

Advertisement

Videos