San Diego Gas & Electric President Debra Reed addresses the North County Times Editorial board on Wednesday.
DON BOOMER Staff Photographer
Order a copy of this photo
Visit our Photo Gallery
By: DAVE DOWNEY - Staff Writer | ∞
San Diego Gas & Electric President Debra Reed addresses the North County Times Editorial board on Wednesday.
NORTH COUNTY -- The region's electric utility says that it has figured out a way to string a 500-kilovolt power line across Anza-Borrego Desert State Park without encroaching on the wilderness.
San Diego Gas & Electric Co. is proposing to build a $1.3 billion transmission line that would run 150 miles from El Centro to San Diego, passing through the park, Ramona and Rancho Penasquitos. The California Public Utilities Commission is scheduled to decide in January whether to grant permission to build the line.
The utility already moves power through the park via 69-kilovolt wires strung from wooden poles within a 100-foot-wide easement it has had for decades. In submitting a plan for its Sunrise Powerlink project last year, the company proposed expanding that path to 150 feet in width to make room for huge 150-foot-tall metal towers.
The proposed expansion triggered an uproar among environmental groups and Anza-Borrego supporters because it would mean eliminating 73 acres of wilderness area in the park, something California state park system officials said was unprecedented.
In a meeting Wednesday with the North County Times editorial board, Debra Reed, San Diego Gas & Electric president, said the utility intends to stay within its easement by stringing the wires instead from 99-foot-tall, 80-foot-wide towers composed of two poles connected by a cross arm. She said the "H-frame" structures would enable the utility to avoid cutting through wilderness.
Reed also reiterated the company's position that the transmission line, if built, would enable the utility to boost the region's electricity supply, bring in nonfossil-fuel power and ensure that air conditioners will keep humming on the hottest days even if a power line or plant is knocked out. Those objectives have been voiced repeatedly by company officials at meetings around San Diego County.
Reed added another goal to the list Wednesday -- to help the state slash greenhouse gas emissions to 1990 levels by 2020. Many scientists believe that gases such as carbon dioxide, produced by the burning of fossil fuels, are creating a thick blanket in the atmosphere that is warming the planet.
The power line has many opponents who dispute the claims about its benefits, and a consumer group concluded after studying the project extensively that it is not needed. Environmental groups and residents living along the proposed path say the project will harm wildlife, ruin scenic views in the state park and elsewhere, and drag down property values in neighborhoods.
The project has widespread support in the business community.
Opponents and proponents alike will get the opportunity to outline their reasons for rejecting or approving the power line in California Public Utilities Commission hearings in San Diego, beginning on July 9.
When it comes to nonfossil-fuel power, the utility has just 90 megawatts at the moment, Reed said. She said the region will need an additional 910 megawatts -- or a total of 1,000 megawatts -- by 2010. That's because a state mandate requires the state's major utilities to secure 20 percent of their electricity by then from nonfossil-fuel sources, such as solar, wind and geothermal energy.
The region's supply is approximately 5,000 megawatts. A megawatt is the standard measuring unit for electricity and is generally what is required to keep the lights on in 750 homes, although on hotter days, much more power is required.
The Sunrise Powerlink's path would put wires near the Salton Sea, where several solar and geothermal plants have been proposed. One is Stirling Energy Systems' huge solar plant that could produce 300 megawatts initially, and eventually up to 900. The plant would rely on technology that has yet to be proven commercially.
Critics charge that the utility's plan to bring in nonfossil-fuel, or renewable, power is largely dependent on the Stirling project's success and will collapse if the project fails.
Not so, said Mike Niggli, chief operating officer for Sempra Energy's utilities, which include San Diego Gas & Electric and Southern California Gas Co. If Stirling fails, he said, there would be plenty of other opportunities to move renewable power from the desert to San Diego County over the Sunrise line.
"Whoever fails, it isn't going to matter at the end of the day," Niggli said.
Niggli said San Diego Gas & Electric is reviewing proposals from a variety of entrepreneurs to build renewable-power projects.
On another matter, Niggli said there is a good chance the utility will exercise an option to buy a 480-megawatt power plant in Nevada known as El Dorado to boost supplies. During the spring, San Diego Gas & Electric invited local entrepreneurs to submit alternative proposals.
"It is going to be very hard for anybody to beat that option," he said.
-- Contact staff writer Dave Downey at (760) 740-5442 or ddowney@nctimes.com.
Advertisement
Warner: wrote on Jun 28, 2007 7:56 AM: Come on, the wilderness is where the power line should be - with good access for maintenance. Considering near future population growth, and energy demands, we will need those lines in place, and soon. Pity the environmentalist with no common sense.
Backcountry resident wrote on Jun 28, 2007 7:57 AM:Why is the answer always more construction and more consumption. Here's a novel idea, why not try conservation for a change! If everyone just cut back on their electricity usage by even a little bit, it could make a huge difference in the demand. Too many people and businesses act as if we have a never-ending supply of energy and resources!
Bob from Temecula wrote on Jun 28, 2007 8:25 AM:I was a member of the group who fought SDG&E and their Valley Rainbow project to string power lines from Romoland to Rainbow through Temecula. SDG&E claimed they need the power for their customers by the year 2004. They changed that to 2005. The CPUC deemed the project "NOT NEEDED." I have witnessed SDG&E lie and make absurd promises to try and push that project through. This article is typical of SDG&E making false promises to get this project built and dire consequences if this project is not built. GOOD LUCK to the opponents of the Sunrise Powerlink. Don't believe anything SDG&E says or promises.
Scott wrote on Jun 28, 2007 9:49 AM:Avoid wilderness? That's all there is out there. There is no way to avoid it.
Yeah right wrote on Jun 28, 2007 10:00 AM:And the Nevada power plant doesn't run on fossil fuels? Right....
Independant Solar Now wrote on Jun 28, 2007 11:47 AM:We're wasting all this roof top sunshine already! Rebates for solar panels....
peoples voice wrote on Jun 28, 2007 12:36 PM:Lets put power lines along the La Jolla coast, Torrey Pines and Thru Balboa Park too!!!! Good thinking SDG&E!!!!!!!!
To Backcountry resident wrote on Jun 28, 2007 1:47 PM:So what kind of conservation efforts are you making while reading the news on you electric powered computer? What about electric powered cars? Do we reduce emitions, or conserve energy?
Against the Power Line? wrote on Jun 28, 2007 3:23 PM:Please cut the wires to your house, apartment or what ever and let us that don't want to live in a 3rd world country have it. Please turn yours off and let the new people coming here have it. Anything that promotes modernization or growth you ... crawl out to make up some reason or excuse to protest. Do you have anything better to do?
Ace wrote on Jun 28, 2007 10:25 PM:How about building a power plant in San Diego?...nevermind, we don't need the jobs and to much redtape.
Green Power wrote on Jun 28, 2007 10:54 PM:The environmentalists say they want green power, but never stand up to support anything! You can't have it both ways. We need the Sunrise line to connect to green power in the Imperial Valley.
BILL wrote on Aug 30, 2007 8:46 PM:why is it always easier to further destroy nature rather than make some easy changes and conserve energy? After we've tried conservation, then we can look at eliminating hundreds of acres of land for the power lines footprint. Read the EIR - I did.
Frankie wrote on Sep 26, 2007 2:07 PM:When will environmentalist learn that other people live in a community too. I am sick to death of their pandering to local and state politicians also the feds. they should be put into one state and live there and do nothing but laze about looking at scenery and have no viable means of support...
MS wrote on Oct 19, 2007 8:36 PM:The new report just came our from Shames of UCAN.ORG. Its really an eye-opener of Modus Operandi of SDGE. They are asking for hiking rates when they actually should be going down. The worst thing is that we will end up building an unneeded powerline, thru wild life, and in the process, fill SEMPRA coffers. I just wonder what the government officials are doing. http://ucan.org/files/UCAN_opening_brief_Sempra_SDGE_General%20Rate%20Case.pdf
ron paul 4 president wrote on Dec 13, 2007 11:30 AM:LET US CREATE OUR OWN ENERGY!
First name only. Comments including last names, contact addresses, e-mail addresses or phone numbers will be deleted. Attempts to misrepresent your identity or impersonate any person will not be approved. All comments are screened before they appear online, so please keep them brief. Comments reflect the views of those commenting and not necessarily those of the North County Times or its staff writers. Click here to view additional comment policies.
Today's Stories
Advertisement