Thousands of U.S. troops are being held back from overseas duty because of debt

By: THOMAS WATKINS - Associated Press | Thursday, October 19, 2006 7:21 PM PDT

SAN DIEGO -- Thousands of U.S. troops are being barred from overseas duty because they are so deep in debt they are considered security risks, according to an Associated Press review of military records.

The number of troops held back has climbed dramatically in the past few years. And while they appear to represent a very small percentage of all U.S. military personnel, the increase is occurring at a time when the armed forces are stretched thin by the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

"We are seeing an alarming trend in degrading financial health," said Navy Capt. Mark D. Patton, commanding officer at San Diego's Naval Base Point Loma.

The Pentagon contends financial problems can distract personnel from their duties or make them vulnerable to bribery and treason. As a result, those who fall heavily into debt can be stripped of the security clearances they need to go overseas.

While the number of revoked clearances has surged since the beginning of the Iraq war, military officials say there is no evidence that service members are deliberately running up debts to stay out of harm's way.

Officials also say the increase has not undermined the military's fighting ability, though some say it has complicated the job of assembling some of the units needed in Iraq or Afghanistan.

The problem is attributed to a lack of financial smarts among recruits; reckless spending among those exhilarated to make it home alive from a tour of duty; and the profusion of "payday lenders" -- businesses that allow military personnel to borrow against their next paycheck at extremely high interest rates.

The debt problems persist despite crackdowns on payday lenders and the financial counseling the Pentagon routinely offers to the troops.

Data supplied to the AP by the Navy, Marines and Air Force show that the number of clearances revoked for financial reasons rose every year between 2002 and 2005, climbing ninefold from 284 at the start of the period to 2,654 last year. Partial numbers from this year suggest the trend continues.

More than 6,300 troops in the three branches lost their clearances during that four-year period. Roughly 900,000 people are serving in the three branches, though not all need clearances.

The figures gathered by the AP represent just a piece of problem, because the Army -- which employs an additional 500,000 people and accounts for the vast majority of the 160,000 U.S. troops in Iraq and Afghanistan -- rejected repeated requests over the past month to supply its data, saying such information is confidential.

At Point Loma, Patton said clearance revocations in key areas such as military police forces have gotten so common that he often looks for two sailors to fill a single posting.

Still, Patton said he had never heard of anyone racking up bills to get out of combat. "There are folks who find ways of avoiding being deployed, as there always will be, but I've never seen any do it through finances," he said.

Security clearances are revoked when service members' debt payments amount to 30 percent to 40 percent of their salary. The exact amount depends on the military branch.

There are three levels of clearance -- confidential, secret and top secret. Not all troops need clearance. Marine infantrymen don't, but some Marine specialists, such as those in intelligence, do. So do many jobs in the Navy and Air Force.

Financial problems are the overwhelming reason security clearances are revoked. Other reasons include criminal activity, questionable allegiance and ill health.

A key reason the military revokes clearances on financial grounds is the fear that soldiers in debt might be tempted to sell secrets or equipment to the enemy.

Also, "when they are over there fighting, we like them to have their heads in the game," said Maj. Gen. Michael Lehnert, commander of Marine Corps bases in the western United States. "We like to have them ... not worrying about whether or not they are going to be able to make the mortgage payment or car payment."

Members of the brass also blame runaway interest rates at payday lending businesses, many of which are clustered outside bases around the country. Several states have cracked down on payday lending practices, and on Tuesday, President Bush signed legislation limiting how much these businesses can charge military personnel.

Some personnel fall into debt upon returning from combat.

"It can be hard to cut that sense of elation and desire to live for the moment," Lehnert said. "Some tend to get themselves overextended financially."

Also, when they go to war, they get combat pay, and none of their income is taxed. That can lead them to overspend when they come home.

Patton said that like other services, the Navy offers zero-interest emergency loans. Also, military personnel commonly take money-management classes as part of basic training.

"Every time we go in and do an indoctrination brief, there is instruction or training in place to give them some of the pitfalls of debt," said Terry Harris, a personal finance educator at the Pensacola Naval Air Station in Florida. "We do inform them about the pitfalls of security clearances being lost to that."

The increase in finance-related revocations could actually be a good sign -- it could reflect greater awareness among the troops, according to Chief Master Sgt. Rodney J. McKinley, the Air Force's highest-ranking noncommissioned officer.

"We have a few more people coming forward and saying, `Hey, I'm having some financial difficulty and need help,' versus going down the other path where they keep so quiet," McKinley said.

-- Associated Press Writers Pauline Jelinek in Washington, Melissa Nelson in Pensacola, Fla., and Estes Thompson in Raleigh, N.C., contributed to this report.

Next

Advertisement

Pre-Registration Comments[-]Go to Top

Tim wrote on Oct 19, 2006 9:18 PM:This policy is insane.We keep hearing "support the troops". Why doesn't the government support them and pay them a decent salary so their families don't have to go on welfare.I may not agree with the current Presidents' policy but if we are going to send our boys into harms way and they are willing to go let them go and pay them so they can stay financially afloat.

Randy wrote on Oct 20, 2006 4:24 AM:My friend in the reserves returned from a month overseas, then was ordered back for another six months. He has not received reimbursement for the cost of coming home. He has not received a military paycheck. Perhaps if the military paid timely, soldiers would not be resorting to predatory payday lenders.

Goatskull wrote on Oct 20, 2006 9:09 AM:Well you gotta understand that this is their own doing. Part of the problem is that these guys (and gals for that mattter) go out and buy and buy and buy and also get suckered into these "payday" loans and other scams. Then there are the ones who go out and have families while still low in rank and don't first look at the cost of living here in SD county. I remember having some of these kids who worked for me (I'm retired Navy) live on an and E3's sallary, be married with 3 kids and the wife not working outside of the home. Considering how expensive San Diego is I never could understand why these kids got themselves into that situation. As far as a decent salary, yeah it could be better but as a person moves up in rank the pay goes up. Matter of fact I'm making less money now than I did up to the point of retirement. Bottome line is these kids need to watch their finances and make decisions based on what their current situation is. If they get married they may want to hold off on the kids for awhile and be a dual income family (It's almost 2007 for God's sake).

Harry wrote on Oct 20, 2006 9:11 AM:I think this means we should draft the children who qualify for the tax breaks that Bush has been giving to the wealthiest of Americans. It would balance out the "No Death Tax" advantage, by giving them at least as much chance to die, as the children of the middle class and impoverished. "To those to whom much is given, much is expected."

AW4CRYINOUTLOUD wrote on Oct 20, 2006 9:53 AM:To Tim: Dittos!! I just read the article and was thinking the same. Actors and athletes make millions in just one year for 'entertaining' us. One in the military may get a few thousand to enlist or to re-up. They are not only risking their lives, but great physical injury; Not to mention being away from their families. When you think about it...today they have sadly become 'entertainment'; what with embedded reporters on their backs eveywhere they go and having it play on television over and over. Maybe the media which profits from these videos should poney-up a 'huge' check for the troops everytime they're videoed. Even when a whole platoon or brigade is videoed, they should be recompensed because they've "been made" part of what the media has become: "entertainment". Years ago I worked at Old Tucson (tourist attraction where they film movies) in Arizona. Their wages were half the minimum wage. When I asked why, they said that any business listed as entertainment doesn't have to pay minimum wage. At the time, (I don't know about today), people in concession stands in theaters were also paid less. Our Law Enforcement, Firefighters, and 'Anyone' who puts themselves in harms way for us should be valued with the monetary respect equal to the repect we have for them as our own. And THAT is at the top of My list.

Am I crazy wrote on Oct 20, 2006 12:11 PM:They pull their security clearance if their debt is 30 to 40 percent of their income? A house payment can be that high. I am a bit confused about that because it seems to me that most people use up to 50% of their monthly income on rent, a car and insurance.

Outraged Military Spouse wrote on Oct 20, 2006 2:36 PM:I am appalled that you all think it is always the service members fault. I have been a military spouse for the last 16 yrs and have 4 children, yes it is hard and for a good portion of the 16 yrs I was a stay at home mom because of the cost of childcare. What the civilian world does not understand is that 90 percent of active duty in CA is able to receive food stamps. It is a shame when service members put their life on the line for all of us and we are considered poverty level after 18 years in the Marine Corps. Wake up and start paying these guys what they deserve and help out our welfare department along with our military

Harry wrote on Oct 20, 2006 4:29 PM:I absolutely agree with the Outraged Military Spouse! The economic hardships coupled with cuts to veterans medical benefits are indicative of the real lack of concern for the enlisted military. There is a lot of talk about how Bush values each and every life, but it takes Cher to run a campaign to purchase helmet liners to prevent head injuries. The proliferation of payday advance loan sharks near the bases, is a pretty good sign that these families are struggling.

Registered Comments[-]Go to Top

Advertisement

Videos